Two benchmarks were used differing only in image size: diglloydMedium (20,000 pixel-wide image, 15.7GB scratch file) and diglloydHuge (40,000 pixel-wide image, 56.4GB scratch file). Intel Core I7 (4790K Quad Core 4GHz) Processor.MODEL Mac ProMid 2010 CPU Intel Xenon 2x2.4GHz Quad-Core RAM 24GB DDR3 OPERATING SYSTEM Mac OS X 10.8.4 APPLICATION ProTools HD 10.3.8 GRADE ProTools HDX Sync HD HD I/O x2 Analog 24in/16out CONTROL SURFACE Artist Control&Mix List of Plug-in1/4 Manufacture Name Auto-Tune 5 Native Auto-Tune 5 TDM AVOX ARTICULATOR AVOX ASPIRE AVOX CHOIR AVOX. Hackintosh Mini ITX Build GIGABYTE MotherBoard Z390 I AORUS PRO WiFi i9 9900K. Two new base models of the 15-inch MacBook Pro are available, with the 2.8GHz quad-core i7 model with 256GB of storage and the Radeon Pro 555X GPU selling for 2399, and one with a 2.9GHz processor, 512GB of storage, and the Radeon Pro 560X GPU selling for 2799.Updated - Send Feedback Related: Apple macOS, CPU cores, hard drive, Mac Pro, memory, optimization, Photoshop, RAID, Seagate, software, SSD2Ghz on all cores. The updated 2.3GHz quad-core i5 Touch Bar-equipped 13-inch MacBook Pro with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage retails for 1799.Memory configuration was varied at 8/16/32GB.My mid-2010 Macbook Pro has a bad discrete GPU so of course that is pretty. MacBook Pro (Mid 2010 or newer) MacBook Air (Late 2010 or newer) Mac mini (Mid 2010 or newer) iMac (Late 2009 or newer) Mac Pro (Mid 2010 or newer) OS X 10.11 El Capitan.Tests were run using 1/2/3/4/5/6 drives for scratch with the 2/3/4/5/6 drives setup using a striped RAID volume, each drive contributing 32GB from the fast side of the drive. A 3.5 GHz 8-core or 12-Core Intel Xeon W processor with 32 GB of RAM, a 256 GB SSD.Base configuration: - 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon W3530 Nehalem CPU - 16GB (4x 4GB) of 1333MHz DDR3 ECC RAM - 4-port PCIe USB 3.0 expansion card - Built-in. See the Benchmark Actions page for more on the test benchmarks.Mac Pro (Tower, Mid 2010) / 2.8 GHz 4-Core Xeon W3530 / MC250LL/A.
![]() Determining the scratch size requirements are essential to knowing how much memory is needed. 8GB with a single drive is 372% slower than the optimal configuration.Best compromise: 32GB with a 3 or 4-drive striped RAID (10-15% slower than best possible)Best performance: 32GB with a 6-drive striped RAIDFor diglloydHuge, adding 32GB memory improved performance substantially, because 16GB was inadequate to cache the scratch data (about 56GB). A single drive is 60 - 120% slower than a striped RAID. 16GB memory is 30 - 40% slower than 32GB memory. 8GB memory is 96 - 216% slower than 32GB memory. 32Gb Ram Pro Mid 2010 Quad Core Install More IfThe Intel X25-M is limited to about 75MB/sec write speed (250MB/sec read!). And my new winner, the OWC Mercury Elite SSD.Results with the Intel X25-M solid state drive show that nothing substitutes for fast write speed. See also the review of the Intel X25-M and review of the Intel X25-E. The 8-core Mac Pro is about 10% faster overall than the 3.0GHz quad-core Mac Pro. Results were cross-checked in various ways.Seconds to execute tests under different combinations of RAM and drive arrays# of Disks (SEAGATE Barracuda ES.2 ST31000340NS)DiglloydHuge with eight-core Mac Pro — hard drives and SSD PERMALINKUpdate Feb 2010— see results with the OWC Mercury Extreme.These results are with 32GB memory on a 2.8GHz eight-core Mac Pro with Mac OS X 10.5.6. Presumably, if 64GB could be installed, then times would drop further.Using 16GB instead of 32GB causes 25-40% longer running time, depending on drives.Lesson: determine how much memory you need and install more if needed for a big time savings.Seconds to execute diglloydHuge with 1/2/3/4/5/6 drives and 8/16/32GB memory (8GB measurements checked only with 1, 4 drives)Data as measured. Four-drive stripe.Internal Mac Pro SATA ports (the two extra ports on the motherboard). Bottom line: hard drives are clear winners for write speed until SSD write speeds can be improved.Update Feb 2010: the new OWC Mercury Elite SSD offers outstanding write performance, better than any 4-drive RAID stripe I've seen! See the Photoshop test with a dual-drive RAID 0 stripe.Internal Mac Pro drive bays. Alternately, two of the enterprise-grade X25-E drives (170MB/sec for writes) should provide similar performance. Evaluating brand and model of hard driveA 4-drive striped RAID (32K stripe size) was compared for each brand/model as shown below, using 32GB memory. DiglloydHuge with Mac Pro Nehalem 2.93 GHz PERMALINKThese results are with a 2.93GHz Mac Pro Nehalem with a 4-drive striped ( Western Digital RE-3).This is our new speed champ, and even though the test is still heavily dependent on disk speed, the 2.93GHz Mac Pro Nehalem (see review) still comes out the winner by about 6%.32GBv Western Digital 4X1TB striped partition24GB Western Digital 4X1TB striped partitionThe 24GB configuration is just as fast as the 32GB configuration! This might have something to do with Photoshop’s 32GB memory bug.The extensive test matrix detailed above was not replicated for the other brands of hard drives because the trends are clear, and unlikely to change in terms of memory and number of hard drives for the RAID stripe.Saved my iPhone more than once. Update for Photoshop CS4 11.0.1 (Feb 27, 200) PERMALINKThe diglloydHuge benchmark was run before and after installing the 11.0.1 update on an 8-core 2.8GHz Mac Pro with 32GB memory and a 4-drive stripe (Western Digital RE3), Mac OS X 10.5.6.The before/after results show that performance remains the same:The memory allocation issue has not been resolved, hopefully that will come in sometime soon. The winners PERMALINKThe enterprise-class Western Digital “RE3” is the clear winner. The Mac Pro internal bays/ports are simpler, cheaper, and quieter, so use them if they’re available. It does appear that the internal Mac Pro SATA ports run slightly faster than the external setup. Both products are recommended, and available at OWC.Note that the Seagate 1TB Barracuda ES.2 drives tested internally and externally were different units (8 different drives), so strictly speaking that’s another test variable that changed. Except as noted, the 4 drives were installed in a FirmTek SeriTek/2eEN4 connected with 4 eSATA cables to a Sonnet Tempo E4P PCI-Express card. Lord of the rings keygenApple’s Disk Utility requires erasing the drive to change the journaling setting.Observe that the previous generation 500GB Maxtor 7H500F0 drives do not perform nearly as well as any of the current 1TB drives. Journaling is not needed for a scratch disk, but is important for data integrity in the event of a system crash it is enabled by default, but can be quickly enabled or disabled by SoftRAID. One warning: some users have reported 20-30 second “freezes” on Mac OS X with file-system journaling enabled. The MacBook Pro results show that the particular combination of drive and hardware can change the relative rankings: the high level point here is that a a 4-drive stripe is the big win, with smaller improvements obtained by choosing the brand/model of drive.Surprisingly, the consumer-grade Seagate 1.5TB drive was the 2nd-best performer, making it a relative bargain: 50% more storage and nearly the same performance. The same might also be true for the other drives, but this might be drive-dependent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMary ArchivesCategories |